Sign-In:  
New Member: Vinay Cardoza, India | Join Now! |
Sep, 06
 

Britain bans Indian Muslim preacher

 
Print this articlePrint article |  Send this article to a friend E-mail article | Post comment | View comments

London, June 18 (IANS) Indian Muslim preacher Zakir Naik who claimed "every Muslim should be terrorist" has been banned from entering Britain, The Daily Telegraph reported Friday.

Naik, 44-year-old tele-evangelist, was due to deliver a series of lectures in Wembley Arena and Sheffield. 

Britain's new Home Secretary Theresa May said she was banning Naik from entering the country as the "numerous comments" he made were evidence of his "unacceptable behaviour". 

"Coming to the UK is a privilege not a right and I am not wiling to allow those who might not be conducive to the public good to enter the UK," May told The Daily Telegraph.

"Exclusion powers are very serious and no decision is taken lightly or as a method of stopping open debate on issues."

According to Home Office sources, Naik had been shown on a website making inflammatory comments such as "every Muslim should be a terrorist".

He said: "When a robber sees a policeman he's terrified. So for a robber, a policeman is a terrorist. So in this context, every Muslim should be a terrorist to the robber".

He has also been filmed saying: "There are many Jews who are good to Muslims, but as a whole... The Quran tells us, as a whole, they will be our staunchest enemy".

In a web posting in 2006 he said: "Beware of Muslims saying Osama bin Laden is right or wrong. I reject them... we don't know.

"But if you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him. I don't know what he's doing. I'm not in touch with him. I don't know him personally. I read the newspaper.

"If he is terrorising the terrorists, if he is terrorising America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, every Muslim should be a terrorist".

He is also reported to have said that western women make themselves "more susceptible to rape" by wearing revealing clothing.

 Comment on this article Print this articlePrint article |  Send this article to a friend E-mail article
Name: Country:
Comments:
Security code: Security code   Reload Image
Enter code:   (shown above)
 
ali, Ghana Jul 30, 2010
this statements is nothing but the truth.if something is going on in this world, we cannot just jump into conclution and give judgement. we have to know the autentic source before given our judgement and our judgement must be just.naik is telling the truth, believe me,the truth will surely set him free.
Don, Canada Jun 19, 2010
ZAKIR NAIK PRESS RELEASE

I have studied Islam for 5 years and have seen several of Zakir’s videos and regretfully like most Islamic scholars he speaks from both sides of his mouth.

When he is in the west, he quotes from the peaceful verses, which were preached when the Prophet of Islam was in Mecca. But when he became the head of state and moved into Medina the peaceful verses were abrogated and were replaced by the verse of the “sword”. Muslims call the abrogation of Koranic verses as “Naskh”

Here are some of his statements that I would like to analyze:

He said: "When a robber sees a policeman he's terrified. So for a robber, a policeman is a terrorist. So in this context, every Muslim should be a terrorist to the robber".

I find it offensive that Zakir has made the assumption that non-Muslims are thieves, and Muslims are policeman. Who is Zakir to decide who is a robber and who is a policeman? Is he implying that out of the 7 billion people worldwide, 1 billion are policeman (Muslims) and 6 billion are robbers (non-Muslims)?

"If he is terrorizing the terrorists, if he is terrorizing America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, every Muslim should be a terrorist".

Zakir has condemned (Judge, Jury & Executioner) America and millions of Americans as the terrorist, and he has asked clearly and unequivocally for Muslims to terrorize America. What would happen if every preacher labeled the followers of other religions as "terrorist" and ask the followers of their religion to attack people of other religions, is he not taking the law into his hand?

In a web posting in 2006 he said: "Beware of Muslims saying Osama bin Laden is right or wrong. I reject them... we don't know. "But if you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him. I don't know what he's doing. I'm not in touch with him. I don't know him personally. I read the newspaper.
Zakir has never condemned the 9/11 destruction of the WTC, where 3000 innocent people died, in fact he called it an inside job. On one hand he says he does not know if Osama bin Laden is right or wrong, and he does not know him personally etc but then he continues saying if given the “truth” and “if” he is fighting the enemies of Islam, then he is for him.
Long story short Zakir Naik is nothing but a wolf in sheep’s clothing and Britain has taken out his mask and banned him from coming there. I sincerely hope that all peace-loving countries ban him and any person irrespective of his or her faith should be treated in a similar way. I would ask that the Indian government to rein in and prosecute this “hate preacher” for they are a disgrace and a slap in the face for all peace loving people.
Dinesh B., USA Jun 19, 2010
For any person visiting Britain or any other foreign country for that matter is certainly a privilege. The preacher (Zakir Naik) has no business to talk about why every Muslim must be a terrorist. The British Foreign Secretary has every right to stop anyone from entering Britain in as much as the Indian Foreigh Minister does. Honest and law abiding Indians living abroad now cannot reenter India (their own land of birth) within 2 months of their departure unless they get approval from the Govt. of India. If such restrictions can be placed on NRIs, and is a legal measure under the Indian Laws, banning a person who might instigate terrorism or hatred is also legal as the Foreign Secretary of Britain and the British Government have a duty to protect their country. Hasn't India banned people from entering the country? Hasn't the US prevented Gujarat CM Modi from entering the US though he was not a Muslim terrorist? The preacher's case no legal grounding as there is overwhelming evidence of instigating terrorism in the remarks and speeches that he has made. Freedom of Speech though guaranteed under democratic constitutions, it does not mean a foreign national has a right to come and instigate the local members of his community. Would India tolerate a Pakistani coming and talking about terrorism on India soil? As to Mr. Lawrence's comments on Naik and nayak both belonging to the GSB community - Naiks do not belong to GSB community. Only Nayaks are generally part of the GSB community. The last name Naik is more prevalent among Marathis. I am glad to see that one of the most tolerant and open minded government that has provided political asylum to such people as the Bhutto family, has approached the matter very fairly. This goes to prove that it is not the issue of being a Muslim, but rather what one does with their privilege of entering and talking in Britain. I hope this preacher is also watched by the Indian Government. India does not need more hatred amongst its people nor any interpretation of what the religion says - keep it to yourself and keep it in your own house or the prayer halls, Mr. Naik. Visit Pakistan and see how many Hindus enjoy the freedom that you have in India and ask the Pakistani government or take them to court for not letting a Hindu Preacher speak there! You are bound to lose the case in Britain.
Peter, New Zealand Jun 19, 2010
DR ZAKIR NAIK - PRESS RELEASE

The purpose of this statement is in response to the recent press reports about my intended tour to the UK in June 2010, including the things I am supposed to have previously said including their context and my views about terrorism and violent extremism in the light of the beautiful faith of Islam.

My work over the past 18 years, using the Glorious Qur’an and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) has focused mainly on the clarification of the important issues, including such topics as; Women’s status and rights, terrorism and the killing of innocent civilians, the profound message of and the route to Peace in Islam, the universal brotherhood based on the oneness of God, amongst several other topics.

As a student of comparative religion my work has involved engaging in constructive discussion with people of other major faiths, promoting similarities and converging values for a common platform of Peace using the commonalities that bind us all together based on the various religious scriptures including the Bible, Vedas, Torah and Glorious Qur’an. These discussions and debates have been hugely successful and have resulted in much progress towards a better understanding of Islam as well as enhanced harmony between people of different beliefs, dispelling fears, suspicions and misunderstandings.

I have spoken out on numerous occasions against all and any acts of terrorism and I have unequivocally condemned such acts of violence; acts including 9/11, 7/7 and 7/11 (Serial Train bombing in Mumbai) which are completely and absolutely unjustifiable on any basis.

I believe recent press reports in the UK media have given a warped and wholly unjustified impression of my work by portraying me as a “Preacher of Hate” and “Terror Backer”. I categorically reject as falsehoods any such allegations. These are totally untrue and a misrepresentation of the truth. It appears these sensational headlines have been based on some of my quotes that have been based on some of my quotes that have been given either without the relevant context or are completely wrong. It is clear from many of my talks, that in Islam, terrorism; the killing of innocent civilians is completely forbidden and as such I have unequivocally stated that no Muslim should be a terrorist.

It appears that some of the quotes have been taken from edited and manipulated excerpts uploaded onto the you-tube website including a talk that I delivered in 1996 in Singapore which was prior to the 9/11 atrocity. I am currently seeking advice from lawyers in the UK on the legal remedy and actions in the light of these reports.

My tour to the UK will be focused on delivering a message of Peace based on Islamic values and bridging the gap of understanding between the major faiths. My visit will include engaging in constructive and positive dialogue between members of different communities and to dispel the misconceptions of Islam. I will be delivering a message of Peace, unity, respect and tolerance for any differences that may prevail. I also understanding the sensitivities and current difficult climate prevailing within the west and therefore my tour will also include a clear and concise message to young British Muslims that terrorism and violent extremism, including suicide bombings killing innocent civilians, is totally unacceptable and has no place in Islamic life, based on the Glorious Qur’an and the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh).

In the Glorious Qur’an it says;

In Chapter 5, Verse 32; “That if any one killed a person (whether Muslim or Non-Muslim), unless it be for murder or for spreading corruption in the land it would be as if he has killed the whole of humanity”

In chapter 3 Verse 64; Say: “O People of the Book! Come to common terms as between us and you”
I hope to reach out to all youngsters and persons generally who promote confrontation and violence in the name of Islam; to engage in peaceful and constructive discussion with other communities, authorities and government to deal with any issues or grievances they may be fostering. I also hope to the reassure the wider British People that my message to British Muslims is one of integration and service to the Country and fellow citizens, based on the beautiful faith of Islam which revealed as a guide to living in this world, for the whole of mankind.

As many of you will know I am due to come to the UK between the 18th to 28th June 2010 with my family and staff to conduct a Peace Conference Tour.

I pray to Allah (swt) that he guides us all to eternal and everlasting peace and harmony on this earth. Aameen.

Dr. Zaikir Naik
Justin Lobo, Bangalore, India Jun 19, 2010
Mr. Farahan, Australia, Ideed you have studied math’s 2+2=4 and at the same time 1 X 1 X 1=1 My multiplication is also correct.
Sunny, UAE Jun 19, 2010
Good work Britan, this chap has a mental problem and he deserved this treatment. India, have you learnt something from Britan????

If supporters of this chap are talking of freedom of speech, then first ask the Islamic nations to allow such speeches & discourses from other religions. SACCHAI KADVI HOT HAIN DOSTON !!!!!
Nagendra Shenoy, India Jun 19, 2010
"Coming to the UK is a privilege not a right" - Theresa May

What a statement! Take a bow :)

I am unhappy with the media tagging INDIAN against Zakir Naik's name. It has pained me deeply.
Lawrence, USA Jun 19, 2010
K.S.,what is the difference between Naik and Nayak. Are they both belong to GSB?
Hariprasad Hegde, India Jun 19, 2010
all the countries allowed them and now these people's are stabbing them from behind....
Ahmed, India Jun 19, 2010
Britain's new Home Secretary Theresa May, is she really from Britain??? I think she is having problem in understanding Naik's english (Hinglish). I would say, any matter which is not verified before commenting is a totally ignorance and irresponsibity of high calibre person like home secretary. Zakir Naik, should refrain from giving the real meanings of such words which has been labelled only for Muslims such as "TERRORISTS", "FUNDAMENTALIST". And comments on the article by pro-RSS are filled with hatred towards a community. Wish you all will realize the TRUTH and live peacefully and with harmony.
Nelson Lewis, Bahrain Jun 19, 2010
Dear Mr. Shenoy,

I have never thought much of Zakir Naik, other than a rabble rouser whose audiences are mostly the gullible.

Yes, he is a good orator, who has mastered the Koran and other Holy Books and put it to good use to earn his bread and butter. Well, this is assured because in India and in other countries, where Godmen, preachers, politicians and monied people hold the sway, there are masses who have not had quality education or are uneducated, are not knowledgeable, wordly wise and street smart and, therefore, lack the confidence. These are the people over whom this Zakir Naik can hold sway on.

Mr. Shenoy, to the best of my knowledge, was educated in one of Bombay's Christian schools, as was told to me by one who studied with him. However, I do not think that he is just 44 years old, but certainly much older.

With regards,

Nelson Lewis
olwin, Canada Jun 19, 2010
53 vs 9

can we have a discussion
Alwyn, Canada Jun 18, 2010
People stop worrying these kind of preachers becasue they only know how to teach hatred. Pray to one god the creator of this whole universe be it Christian, Hindu or Muslim then this world be a better place and all these terrorism around world will disappear. For sure these Mullah's need more education so that they can preach how to love the world and the human beings rather preach hatred. God bless to all.
Don, Canada Jun 18, 2010
Khalid, India - We in the west do not get intimidated by bigots and those who preach intolerance and religious hatred. Do you seriously believe that every time Zakir is here people convert to Islam? Wake up, stop dreaming.

Aftab Sardar, UAE. If the US and UK are suffering from Islamophobia and are banning preachers from Islamic countries, then are preachers of other religions allowed to preach and convert people to their faiths in any Islamic country?

We refuse talk to anyone who incites violence and bloodshed. Mosques are built all over the west, the America’s and in Israel too? But is there a Church, a Synagogue or a Temple in Saudi Arabia
SHENOY R, India Jun 18, 2010
to who are you refering to? Can you clarify in the forum please? -Arshad Doha

Thanks for that query Arshad. Mr Naik is a controversial public figure in his own way. Rushdie was also controversial. Again that Bengali lady created lots of prblems. Do we need all this? Majority of the world looks for peace. Few people like these create tension. Any one who disturbs peace in public should be considered ignorant. Regardless of their educational background, I consider them illiterate as they have not learnt the principle of living in harmony and peace. I hope the explanation is satisfactory.
Romel Katwa, Australia Jun 18, 2010
Such Preachers defame the name of INDIA. India must also ban such preachers who preach "ALL MUSLIMS MUST BE TERRORISTS"

Will USA and AU BAN Nail too? This will again bring bad name to INDIA?
K Shenoy, India Jun 18, 2010
i think zakir naik is a gsb! is he not from kashmir?

does he not carry the suffix naik with his name?

c'mon all the gsbs. we must support him at any cost, for he is our relative!

wait a minute! if he has supported muslim cause, we must think again...hehehe.
sumesh nair, Bahrain Jun 18, 2010
Brits always say proudly about democracy, but what is happening now, ban on a preacher who speaks about Islam. You must not scare of such things. The public always have right to chose right or wrong. Foolishness.
Rafeeq, Australia Jun 18, 2010
Shenoy,

Reflect on the words........"Too much ignorance" and you will do well in life !
Rasheed, India Jun 18, 2010
Its a matter of peoples mind set, how they think and act in a given circumstances. one can only say that, its up to the people in power and position to decide what is wrong and what is right for their own culture and social well being. At the end every one is accountable for their own actions and deeds.
suhas, Kuwait Jun 18, 2010
Hats off to Britian. They surely know how to safeguard their interests and their people. I wish india or an indian politician had the guts to take such an action against some spiritual leader without having the fear of antagonising some religious group. India is surviving only by the policy of appeasement- keep religious elements happy, keeping the international community happy, keeping our neighbours happy, keeping the united nations, world bank, IMF happy, happy and happy and happy.....The only ones who are not happy are we citizens, about whom our politicians dont care.
Bashir, Congo Jun 18, 2010
Britain scared to go open debate with Zakir, because he is an living legend, and Briaint has no scholar to face him.
Khalid, India Jun 18, 2010
Britain scared against Zakir. Once if he enters Britain he will revert minimum 500 to Islams. Britain has no other option than banning him to enter UK.
mustafa mohammed , Saudi Arabia Jun 18, 2010
yes in europe roaming naked is not a crime but wearing hijab (headcover) is banned like france ....
Arshad Doha, Qatar Jun 18, 2010
Dear Shenoy

What you mean "Too Much ignorance of Illiterate People" to who are you refering to? Can you clarify in the forum please?
mustafa mohammed , Saudi Arabia Jun 18, 2010
the words are out of context see his video yu will find it every muslims should be a terrorist for anti law people (in core meaning ) like eg: a police is a terrorist for a thief like wise every muslims sould be a terrorist for the outlaw people. etc .....this is biased banning dont worry this will be cleared
Don, Canada Jun 18, 2010
Pleased to note that Zakir Naik who has been indulging in hate speeches and inciting violence against the west has been banned from entering into Britain.
I sincerely hope this ban would be extended by all peace loving countries across the world, and more importantly since Zakir is an Indian national the Indian government should take appropriate action against such bigots who preach hatred.
Rajesh, Saudi Arabia Jun 18, 2010
Very good
He is one of the pro terrorist
He should be banned in India as well
Justin Lobo, Bangalore, India Jun 18, 2010
Mr. Zakir Naik's fate will be similar to Late Ahmed Deedat's who suffered 9 years on this earth under coma. He could only rotate his eyes and never spoke for lying about Christianity.
AFTAB SARDAR, UAE Jun 18, 2010
the US and UK are suffering from islamophobia. these countries are fearing the spread of islam, thats the reason why islamic preachers are banned from entering the countries. dr. zakir naik conducts open talks on comparitive religions, you should have talked to him, rather than banning him.
Farahan, Australia Jun 18, 2010
Excellent News! Made my day! :)

2 + 2 = 4 not 5 DHHHHHHHHHH NAIK. THIS IS THE CORRECT ANSWER, AND NOT WHAT YOU PREACH.
Kiran, USA Jun 18, 2010
It is a very sad turn of events, when the need of the hour is for more moderate voices to stop extremists from misusing the religion for political causes throughout the world.
http://mangalorean.com/news.php?newstype=local&newsid=183422
Abdul Sattar, Bahrain Jun 18, 2010
HAAA :) this was expected when one uploads videos on Youtube.com shouting against America / UK.

Monkeys dont know who is supplying the bread. It is Saudi Arabia who is giving money to USA/UK to fight terror.
Hariprasad Hegde, India Jun 18, 2010
He should be encountered once he land...
Bangera, India Jun 18, 2010
A man supporting terrorists, he should be banned from India too, for that matter the whole world.
fayaz, Saudi Arabia Jun 18, 2010
what is wrong in Dr.Zakir Naik's statement, Any one who has common sense would understand this, this is just a gimmick from Theresa may.
May God bless you Dr.Naik.
Original R.Pai, USA Jun 18, 2010
Zakir Naik plays with words. However, there is no doubt that he is an apologist to terrorists and loyal to his religion more than India. In his ideal world, there would be no rights or freedom to non-muslim groups.

Having said that, the double standards of west is quite astonishing. These guys go aroud the world telling others how to live. They tell other countries the importance of free speach and freedom. In reality, they have a very little tolerance towards 'outsiders'.
Mishra, USA Jun 18, 2010
I don't think Dr. Naik is a terrorist, but that is my opinion. It is just that he has a tremendous love/fascination for Islam. I have seen a few of his discourse's and have not derived any inspiration. I just see him quote from the quran and interpret it. His fundamental premise is that the quran is absolute. Take the quran out from Dr. Naik and he is left with nothing. His spirituality is not fantastic. But he has the tremendous ability in memorizing the scriptures, not just the quran, but the bible and the veda's which he uses to compare / contrast and then tries to make quran the best which in itself is his failure. I can understand a common man stating this, but a man with his supposed caliber.. it is questionable and I guess that is the reason why he is in trouble in Britan. It is time he starts quoting a bit less.
Bajjodi Dinesh P. Bhat, USA Jun 18, 2010
Ohhh expected to happen... because he is against the Jews. When Salman Rusdhie wrote against Queen Elizabeth & Thacher he was awarded knighthood because he had written against Islam and Muslims. Even, Indians were silent even though salman rushdie wrote against Hindu God and Godess- Zakir Naik you need to mind your words, you may be puzzle with words but this is not the right time to puzzle around with the words. Your community is under scanner for wrong reasons and even false allegations, 90% is false allegations and 10% is done by Muslims. Neverthless, to preach and practise the religions India has given the rights to its citizen.
I had attended Zakir Naik's talks few years back and was impressed with his oratory and memory skills, he quotes from all major religions but as I said before choose the right time to propogate the religions and should know that all religions are same.

I have read the comments from RSS against Jesus Christ which has to be protested in strongest terms.
SHENOY R, India Jun 18, 2010
Sick man. Good move Britain. Congratulations. Too much ignorance of illiterate people.
 
more news..
 
Web Mangalorean.Com
 
Privacy  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Tell your Friend  |  Contact Us  |  Join Us  |  Home    
Site designed and maintained by Mangalorean Media LLC.